SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1923

B.N.KIRPAL, J.S.VERMA
Life Insurance Corporation Of India – Appellant
Versus
Central Industrial Tribunal, Jaipur – Respondent


ORDER

The point involved in this case is the same as in Civil Appeal No. 54 of 1993, R. Thiruvirkolam v. The Presiding Officer & Anr.1 For the reasons given by us in the judgment delivered today in R. Thiruvirkolam, it must be held that the order of removal from service in the present case operates from December 12, 1969 when it was made by the employer and not from any subsequent date. The direction made in the impugned judgment for payment of wages to the deceased workman from December 12, 1969 to December 7, 1987, the date of his death is, therefore, set aside. However, the amount of Rs. 50,000/- paid to the heirs of the deceased workman under the interim order of the Court is not required to be refunded by them to the employer.

2. Consequently, the appeal is allowed in the above terms. No. costs.

Appeal allowed accordingly.

*******

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top