SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1515

G.T.NANAVATI, S.P.KURDUKAR
Government Of Orissa – Appellant
Versus
Haraprasad Das – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Nanavati, J.-Leave granted.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This appeal arises out of the order passed by the Orissa Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 346 of 1995. The O.A. was filed by the four respondents against the Government of Orissa and the Director of Printing, Stationery and Publication for a declaration that they are entitled to be appointed as Copy Holders and for an appropriate direction to the Government and the Director.

3. The Orissa Government is running a Press and in its Production Branch it has a Proof Reading Section. Proof Readers working in that Section are assisted by Copy Holders. There were six vacant posts of Copy Holders in the Government Press as on 16.4.1992. They were to be filled up by direct recruitment in accordance with the Orissa Government Press Industrial Employees Classifcation, Recruitment, Promotion, Conditions of Service and Appeal Rules, 1978 (hereinafter referred to as the "Rules"). Accordingly, the six vacant posts were notified on 16.4.1992. Out of the large number of applicants 194 candidates were found eligible for the written test. The written test was held on 7.3.1993. Forty candidates were found suitable for the or














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top