SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1808

G.N.RAY, G.T.NANAVATI
State Of T. N. – Appellant
Versus
Sivarasan Alias Raghu Alias Sivarasa – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Nanavati, J.-This appeal arises out of the judgment and order of the Principal Sessions Judge and Designated Court, Coimbatore, in C.C. No. 61 of 1992. As the learned Judge acquitted the accused, the State has filed this appeal under Section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as the TADA Act ).

2. The prosecution case is that Shivarajan alias Raghu (Respondent/Accused No. 1) and Vigneswaran alias Vicky (Respondent/ Accused No. 2) who were Sri Lankan nationals and members of LTTE came to India sometime in 1989 without any travelling documents. So also, Guna and Dixon who were Sri Lankan nationals and members of LTTE had come to India in the like manner. Since then they were engaged in obtaining explosive substances, manufacturing bombs and sending them to LTTE in Sri Lanka. In the said clandestine activity they were helped and assisted by Respondent Nos. 3 to 9 (Accused Nos. 3 to 9) who were Indian nationals. Till the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi on 21..5.91, they could carry on the said activity without any hindrance. Thereafter it became difficult for them to do so as the whole of Tamil Nadu was declared as a Noti




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top