SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 208

SUHAS C.SEN, S.B.MAJMUDAR, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY
Most. Rev. P. M. A. Metropolitan – Appellant
Versus
Moran Mar Marthoma Mathews – Respondent


ORDER

These matters are posted before us for orders with respect to the drafting of the decree pursuant to this Court s judgment delivered on January 20, 1995. By order dated March 25, 1996, we had requested Ms. Manju Goel, Registrar (Judicial - II) to prepare the decree in the light of the judgment aforesaid, after notice to both the parties. The learned Registrar had drafted a decree to which both parties filed objections. In view of certain contentions raised by the parties, the matter was remitted to the said Registrar for revising the draft of the decree. She has accordingly prepared a revised draft decree to which again both parties have filed objections. We have heard the counsel for both the parties and direct that the decree shall be prepared in the following manner.

In the first instance, the decree shall set out the ten clauses found in Para 142 of the judgment.

Then it shall set out the following portions from Para 141 of the Judgment. The first portion in Para 141 starts with the words, "We are, however, of the opinion that it this suit no declaration can be granted affecting the rights of Parish churches" and ends with the words "any title to or control over the properti
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top