SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 2032

S.B.MAJMUDAR, N.P.SINGH
New India Assurance Company LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Kusumanchi Kameshwara Rao – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Majmudar, J.-This appeal on the grant of special leave to appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution of India brings in challenge the judgment and decree passed by Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court at Hyderabad whereby respondent No. 1 s suit against the appellant-insurance company, which was defendant No. 1 in the suit, came to be decreed. In order to appreciate the grievance of the appellant against the impugned decree a few background facts deserve to be noted at the outset. We shall refer to the appellant as defendant No. 1 respondent No. 1 as the plaintiff and respondent No. 2 as defendant No. 2 in the latter part of this judgment.

2. The plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,25,000/- against both the defendants in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Kakinada East Godavari District in the State of Andhra Pradesh. The plaintiff s case is that by a Deed dated 23rd April 1971 (Annexure A-2) entered into between the plaintiff and defendant No. 2, the 2nd defendant agreed and undertook to pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs. 1,68,499.32 being the amount settled to be due to the plaintiff. The 2nd defendant also agreed to furnish a guarantee bond from the


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top