SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 430

K.RAMASWAMY, G.T.NANAVATI
Bihar State Water Development Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Arun Kumar Mishra – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

2. This appeal arises from the judgment and order made on 20.11.91 by the High Court of Patna in CWJC No. 6073 of 1991.

3. The specific case set up by the first respondent is that he was working in the Irrigation Department as a permanent employee holding a lien in that post. Subsequently he was transferred along with others to the Bihar State Water Development Corporation the appellant. It is an admitted position that the said Corporation has been wound up. Consequently, instead of termination of the services of the employees working in the Corporation, an attempt was made to have them accommodated in different Departments. The first respondent was sent to the Finance Department which he had challenged. His specific case is that he was still having a lien on the post he hold in the Irrigation Department. That was not controverted in the High Court by filing an affidavit. No contra evidence has been placed before us also.

4. The contention of the Corporation and the Government is that since the Bihar State Water Development Corporation has been wound up, the employees have been adjusted in different Departments. The order passed by the High Court would create diffi










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top