SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 243

1997(3) Supreme 572
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Ramaswamy, S. Saghir Ahmad and G.B. Pattanaik, JJ.
Raj Kumar & Ors. etc. -Appellants
versus
Shakti Raj & Ors. etc. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 923 of 1997
(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 4151of 1996)
With
Civil Appeal Nos. 924, 925-984 of 1997
(Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 4694, 4702-4761 of 1996)
And
Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 8221-8282 & 10357/96
Decided on 11-2-1997
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appearing Parties : Altaf Ahmed, Additional Solicitor General, K. Madhava Reddy, Jitendra Sharma, Sr. Advocates, Ranjit Kumar, Ms. Bina Gupta, Ramesh Singh, Mrs. Rakhi Ray, Uma Datta, R.C. Verma, B.S. Chahar, Jasbir Malik, Prem Malhotra, K.S. Chauhan, Ms. Gunwant Dara, Rajeshwar Singh, Ashok K. Mahajan, M. Qamaruddin, Mrs. M. Qamaruddin, Gian Singh, S.C. Patel, Pawan Kumar Bahl, M.M. Kashayp, Balraj Devan, R.S. Kataria, R.K. Maheshwari, R.K. Khanna, D.B. Vohra, Ranbir Yadav, N.S. Bisht, Advocates.
For the Intervenor. : N.P.S. Panwar and S.N. Bhat, Advocates.
For the Respondent : In-person

Headnote:SERVICE LAW-Punjab Public Works Department (Irrigation Branch) Patwaris State Service, Class III Rules, 1955-Canal Patwaris-Appointments-Procedure-1970 Rules modified 1955 Rules by providing for recruitment in consultation with the Board instead by Canal Divisional Officer-Government constituted a Committee having excluded from purview of 1970 notification, after written examination was conducted under 1955 Rules -Whether method of selection adopted by Selection Committee is correct in law ? -(No)-Procedures adopted both under 1955 Rules and 1970 notification are not correct-After selection of candidates, names of selected candidates were called from employment exchange-What would be correct procedure under the law?-SSSB should call names of all candidates who were successful in written examinations, interview candidates and select them in accordance with law. (Paras 9 & 10, 12, 13)

       

ORDER

In SLP (C) Nos. 8221-82 and 10357/96

Mr. R.C. Verma, Learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw these petitions. They are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

In CA Nos. 923-984/97 (@ SLP (C) Nos. 4151, 4694 and 4702-4761/96 :

Application for intervention is allowed.

Leave granted. We have heard learned counsel on both sides.

2. These appeals by special leave arise from the Division Bench judgment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, made on December 20, 1995 in CWP No. 6816 of 1995 and batch.

3. The admitted facts are that the posts of Canal Patwaris in the Irrigation Department of the State of Haryana are class III posts in the State service. Earlier, they were called Irrigation Booking Clerks and came to be designated as Patwaris in 1981. Prior to the formation of the State of Haryana on November 1, 1966, the recruitment of Canal Patwaris was governed by the Punjab Public Works Department (Irrigation Branch) Patwaris State Service, Class III Rules, 1955 (for short, 1955 Rules ) issued under proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution. Rule 2(i) defines "Apprentice Patwari" to mean a person who after passing the patwar examination is posted a reserve against 7% of the limiting scale of Patwaris sanctioned for a circle. Rule 4 prescribes conditions for appointment to the service. Rule 5 postulates that no person shall be accepted as a candidate Patwari who is less than 18 years or more than 22 years (now 25 years) of age at the time of acceptance (proviso being not relevant, omitted). Rule 6 envisages that "No person shall be appointed to the Service unless he has passed the Matriculation or School Leaving Certificate Examination of a recognised university or its equivalent, but preference shall be given to candidates possessing higher qualifications" (proviso is not relevant, hence omitted). Rule 8 postulates that "All appointments to posts in the service shall be made by the Divisional Officers". Rule 10(a) envisages that "Appointments to the service shall be made by direct appointment". Rule 10(b) provides that :

"(b) The Divisional Officer shall keep a register of accepted candidates for training purposes. Not more than twice the number of candidates required to fill the vacancies for the ensuing year shall be brought on to the list of accepted candidates and trained and sent up for the examination. No candidate shall be accepted for enrolment in the Divisional Candidate s List unless he complies with the conditions mentioned in Rules 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 of these Rules.

Rule 12 provides thus :

"12(a) All candidates, who pass the examination, shall be brought on to the circle register of passed candidates in serial order of passing the examination. When a permanent vacancy occurs in any Division the next passed candidate shall be posted from the circle register irrespective of whether he is serving in a leave or temporary vacancy in another Division of the Circle. The order of appointment shall be issued by the Divisional Officer. The name of a passed candidate who reaches the age of 25 years without having been employed temporarily as a patwari shall be struck off the list. Provided that this maximum age limit shall be relaxed in the case of members of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other Backward Classes to the extent of such period as may be prescribed by Government in this behalf from time to time, in respect of entry of such candidates into service under Government and the names of such candidates shall be retained on the list upto that age, it is the duty of the Superintending Engineer to examine the Circle register of passed candidates early in January each year, in order to see that sufficient candidates are borne on the register to fill all vacancies that are likely to occur during the next two years, and to ensure, as far as possible, that all candidates shall ordinarily obtained permanent employment before they reach the maximum age prescribed under this Rule. A Selection Board consisting of all the Divi












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top