SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 11

1997(3) Supreme 724
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.M. Ahmadi, C.J.I. & Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.
Chemical and Fibres of India Ltd. etc. -Appellants
versus
Union of India & Ors. etc. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 3495 of 1982
with
Civil Appeal No. 3507 of 1982
with
Transferred Case No........of 1996
(Arising out of Transfer Petition (C) No. 188 of 1983)
Decided on 7-1-1997
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appearing Parties : H.N. Salve, Sr. Advocate, Ravinder Narain, Rajan Narain, Ms. Amrita Mitra, Mohit Kapoor, M.R. Gupta, Meenakshi Sakhardande, Manish Kumar, Sudarsh Menon, E.C. Agrawala, A. Subba Rao, Y.P. Mahajan, V.K. Verma, Advocates.

Headnote:EXCISE DUTY-Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944-Item 15A in Schedule I as it stood during period 1962 to 1972-Company manufactured nylon yarn, a synthetic man- made fibre under an industrial licence-For this, company imported caprolactum monomer-In course of processing of caprolactum monomer, company obtained at an intermediate stage a product called Polymer chips -Levy of excise duty on these polymer chips-Whether these polymer chips can be classified under Item 15A of Schedule I as it stood during the period 1962-72 ?-(No)-Item 15A as it stood prior to 28.2.1964 does not cover polymer chips-Polyamides in form of polymer chips of textile grade are not know as synthetic resins to be covered by the term Artificial or synthetic resins . (Paras 13, 25, 26)

       

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.-These appeals and the transferred appeal raise a common question: whether polymer chips manufactured by the assessees and used by them in the manufacture of nylon yarn can be classified, for the purpose of levy of excise duty, under Item 15A in Schedule I to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, as it stood during the period 1962 to 1972. For the sake of convenience we are setting out the facts in relation to the transferred appeal pertaining to M/s. Nirlon Synthetic Fibres and Chemicals Ltd.

2. At all material times the company manufactured nylon yarn, a synthetic man-made fibre under an industrial licence granted by the Government of India. For the manufacture of nylon yarn, the company imported caprolactum monomer. The company paid customs duty as well as countervailing duty on its import of caprolactum monomer. This raw material was used by the company for manufacture of nylon yarn. In the course of processing of caprolactum monomer the company obtained at an intermediate stage a product called Polymer Chips , also known as Nylon 6 Chips, which were consumed in the manufacture of the finished product, namely, nylon yarn. The question relates to the levy of excise duty on these polymer chips. The only question which now survives for our determination is whether these polymer chips can be classified under Item 15A of Schedule I to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 as it stood during the period 1962-1972, since this period covers all the appeals.

3. The assessee has described the process employed in its factory for polymerisation of caprolactum monomer. Once caprolactum is polymerised, it becomes nylon. In order to change the form of this substance and give it the required properties which enable textile yarn to be produced from it further processing is required in the course of which, at an intermediate stage, polymer chips are produced. The chips are obtained for the purpose of removing the remnant monomer so that the subsequent processing becomes more convenient. These chips which are otherwise called Nylon 6 Chips, are then dried, melted and spun into continuous filament by the process of extrusion. The spun filament undergoes further processing in order to get yarn in a saleable from. Polymer chips which are produced by the assessees companies have a relative viscosity of 2.22 to 2.30. The average molecular weight ranges from 10,000 to 18,000. These chips are suited only for the manufacture of textile fibres and are used exclusively for that purpose.

4. With this background, let us examine whether these polymer chips fall under Entry 15A. Entry 15A was amended on 28th of February, 1964. We, therefore, are required to consider Entry 15A as it existed prior to 28.2.1964 and the Entry as it existed after 28.2.1964.

I

5. Entry 15A as it existed prior to 28.2.1964 was as follows:

"Entry 15A: PLASTICS, ALL SORTS:

(i) Moulding powders, 25 ad volarem granules and flakes

(thermosetting and

thermoplastic).

(ii) Polythelene fixer,

Layflat tubings and     P.V.C. sheets (that is to say, polyvinyl chloride sheets),

(iii) Not otherwise specified."

6. The assessee contends that polymer chips or nylon 6 chips manufactured by the assessee are not known in the trade as plastics and hence they cannot be classified under Entry 15A which deals with plastics all sorts.

7. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Volume 18, while dealing with "plastics" has this to say on the subject:

"The articles called "plastic" generally require shaping by heat during their fabrication by moulding or extrusion. Since the newer synthetic products can frequently be used inter-changeably as coatings or as mouldings, the distinction between resins and plastics become less pronounced. Moreover mode

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top