SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 725

1997(4) Supreme 166
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
G.N. Ray and G.T. Nanavati, JJ.
Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd. -Appellant
versus
State of Kerala & Ors. -Respondents
(Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 4652 of 1996)
Decided on 22.4.1997
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : Dipankar P. Gupta, Sr. Adv., J. Gupta, Rana Mukherjee and Indeevar Goodwill, Advocates.
For the Respondents : R.F. Nariman, Sr. Adv., Shaju Francis, C.N. Sree Kumar and T.G. Narayanan Nair, Advocates.

VERY IMPORTANT POINT
If clauses 2(c) and (e) of the Welfare Funds Act are taken into consideration, it will be quite apparent that the legislature has not intended to exclude the government company or the statutory corporations from the purview of the Welfare Funds Act.

Headnote:Kerala Construction Workers Welfare Funds Act, 1989-Clauses 2(c) and (e)-Applicability-Legislature has not intended to exclude government company or statutory corporations from purview of the Act-Unless expressly the instrumentality or agency of government is kept outside the purview of said Act-It would not be proper to interpret the Act in a wide amplitude by removing corporate veil to exclude such instrumentality or agency from purview of the Act-Even though appellant company is an agency or instrumentality of Central Government, it cannot be held to be a department or establishment of government in all cases. (Para 17)

       

JUDGMENT

G.N. Ray, J.-Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The short question that arises for decision in this appeal is whether the appellant which is government company wholly owned and controlled by the Central Government is excluded from the purview of the Kerala Construction Workers Welfare Funds Act 1989 (Act No. 20 of 1989) hereinafter referred to as the Welfare Funds Act.

3. The appellant company entered into an agreement for construction of a stadium at Kaloor, Ernakulam, Kerala with the respondent No. 2 Greater Cochin Development Authority. The terms of the contract inter alia stipulated that sub contractors to be employed by the appellant for execution of the contract were to be approved by the respondent No. 2. The appellant commenced work of construction of stadium and from time to time engaged different contractors on a turnkey basis.

4. The respondent No. 2 started making deduction from the part payment of the bills raised by the appellant at the rate of 1% of the billed amount for the works executed by the appellant on account of contribution under the Welfare Funds Act and the schemes framed thereunder. The appellant company protested against such deduction by the respondent No. 2 by contending that the appellant being a company wholly owned and controlled by the Central Government did not come within the purview of the Welfare Funds Act.

5. For the purpose of appreciating rival contentions of the parties to the appeal the following provisions of the Welfare Funds Act are set out hereunder :

Section 2. Definitions-In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires.

(a) (b)............

(c) "Construction Work" means any construction work carried out by the State Government or quasi-governmental agency or by a public or private undertaking or by a Society or by private individual and includes construction of any building, road, pathway, causeway, bridge, culvert, canal, tank, channel, pond, dam, tunnel, sea walls, walls for the prevention of soil erosion, embankments, bunds, drainage, kanas, culverts, jetties, compound walls, well, and the like, breaking of rocks and rubbles and the repair in whatsoever manner relating thereto and the demolition thereof but does not include the construction works relating to places of public worship or construction work for a residence by a person for his own residential purposes costing not more than Rs. one lakh, repair works other than extensions and reconstruction of his residence, construction work undertaken, by the Government of India or any of its establishments or institutions.

(d) ...........

(e) "Contractor" means any person registered as a Contractor with any Department of the Government of Kerala or with any Department of any other State Government, or with any local authority or with the Kerala Water Authority or Devaswom Boards of Universities in the State, for carrying out construction work for considerating or any person carrying out construction consideration for a Government Company as defined in S. 617 of the Companies Act 1956 (Central Act, 1 of 1956) for any Board, Corporation or Society owned or controlled by the Government of Kerala and includes the Kerala State Construction Corporation.

(f) ..........

(g) Employer: means,-

(i) In the case of construction work undertaken for the State Government or for the Local Authority or for the Kerala Water Authority or for any Universities in the State for Kerala Government Company as defined in Section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Central Act 1 of 1956) or for a Board, Corporation or a Society owned or controlled by the Kerala Government the contractor;

(ii) In any other case, the person for whom construction work is done."

"Section B. Contribution to the Fund (1) A member of the Fund shall contribute to the Fund at the rate specified in any of the slabs hereunder :

SLAB





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top