SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 782

1997(4) Supreme 310
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Suhas C. Sen. and K.S. Paripoornan, JJ.
Anamika Chawla -Petitioner
versus
Metropolitan Magistrate & Ors. -Respondents
Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 432 of 1995
Decided on 1-5-97
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Petitioner : Ms. Indira Jai Singh, Sr. Adv., Sanjay Parikh, Sakesh Kumar, Ms. Anita, Advocates.
Ms. Anamika Chawla and her father R.K. Soral, Arguments concluded.
For the Respondents : R.K. Jain, Sr. Adv., Sushil Kr. Jain, Parkash Srivastava, S. Attreya and R. Vasudeva, Advocates.

Headnote:Constitution of India-Article 32 -Order by Metropolitan Magistrate directing petitioner to be admitted to Psychiatly Centre-Order passed without seeing the alleged patient on basis of medical certificates of two doctors-No slightest abnormality noticed by this Court in petitioner s behaviour-Impugned order of Magistrate was without basis-It was liable to be quashed. (Paras 4 & 5)

       

ORDER

This case arises of alleged ill-treatment of Mrs. Anamika Chawla by her husband and her father. The case is going on since 29th July, 1995. Smt. Anamika Chawla came up against the order passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate on 29th July, 1995 ordering to be admitted to Delhi Psychiatry Centre, 35, Defence Enclave, Vikas Marg, New Delhi, for observation and treatment. This Order was passed with undue haste even without seeing the alleged patient. Medical certificates were produced from Dr. Sunil Mittal and Dr. S.C. Malik. The case of the petitioner, Mrs. Chawla, is that neither of the two doctors had ever met her or examined her. The allegation appears to be true.

2. When the application was moved by Mrs. Anamika Chawla, she was staying in Guild of Service Hostel in New Delhi. The warden of the Hostel appeared in person and stated that she found Mrs. Chawla s behaviour normal. She was on friendly terms with the other inmates of the hostel. It was also recorded in the Order of this Court held on 3rd August, 1993 that this Court had personally questioned the petitioner and had not noticed any mental aberration but since the medical certificates had been produced before the Magistrate, we wanted to examine the case in greater detail.

3. The case has now gone on a number of days. We heard the Doctors and examined the reports, heard all the parties. Mrs. Chawla has appeared before us personally on a number of days. We have spoken to her on all these days. We have not noticed the slightest abnormality in her behaviour.

4. We tried to bring about a reconciliation between the husband and wife but unfortunately no reconciliation could be brought about. The parties were directed to undergo counselling which has gone on for some time. We have seen records sent by the Counsellor. We are of the view that no useful purpose will be served by prolonging this case any further.

5. We hold that there was no basis for passing the impugned order dated 29th July, 1995 by the Metropolitan Magistrate. The Order is quashed. The Writ Petition filed in this Court by Anamika Chawla is disposed of finally as above. There will be no order as to costs.

Petition allowed.

*******

Parallel Citations of other Journals :

Anamika Chawla v. Metropolitan Magistrate, 1997(4) Supreme 310 : JT 1997(5) SC 120

00024

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top