SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 629

D.P.WADHWA, K.RAMASWAMY
S. Vanathan Muthuraja – Appellant
Versus
Ramalingam Alias Krishnamurthy Gurukkal – Respondent


ORDER

This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the learned single Judge of the Madras High Court, made on July 16, 1983 in Second Appeal No. 222/79. For the purpose of disposal of this appeal, it is not necessary to state all the facts. Suffice to state that one Ayyasamy Gurukkal was common ancestor in respect of the suit property. He had four sons, namely, Annasamy, Subbiah, Sundara and Neelkanda. Ramani is the grand-son of Ayyasamy Gurukkal who was impleaded as first defendant. The appellant had purchased his 1/3rd share in the property under the sale deed, Ex.A-6, dated 6.5.1967. Subbiah Gurukkal having been died unmarried; Sundara Gurukkal and Neelkanda Gurukkal had 1/3rd share each; Sundara died leaving behind him four grand-sons, D-3 to D-6 through his son Rajarathina, widow Dorai, D-7; and another son Ramalingam, D-2. Neelkanda died leaving behind him his widow, D-8 and daughter, D-9. His widow D-8 had sold her 1/3rd share to the plaintiff No. 1 under sale deed, Ex.A-7, dated June 26,1970. Initially, the plaintiff had filed OS No. 1848/67 for a declaration of title and injunction of the property purchased under Ex.A-6. Therein, it was held that though sale of









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top