SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 511

G.B.PATTANAIK, S.C.AGRAWAL
Coal India LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Continental Transport And Companynstruction Corpn – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.C. Agrawal, J.-Special leave granted.

2. These appeals are directed against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court dated October 31, 1995 in appeals arising out of Matters Nos. 940 and 941 of 1994 decided by the learned single Judge of the High Court by order dated April 6, 1995. Since they raise common questions, they are being disposed of together.

3. In exercise of the power conferred on it by sub-rule (2) of Rule 81 of the Defendant of India Rules, 1939 the Central Government has made the Colliery Control Order, 1945 (hereinafter referred to as the Colliery Control Order ) which has been continued in force and is now in operation by virtue of Section 16 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, since coal is an essential commodity under Section 2(a)(ii) of the said Act. The Colliery Control Order makes provisions for regulating the production, supply and distribution of coal. The Colliery Control Order postulates that coal shall be supplied by the colliery owner to a person engaged in the business of production, supply and distribution of or trade or commerce in coal on the basis of an order of allotment issued by the Coal Controller. By Notification dated July 24, 196








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top