SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 621

K.RAMASWAMY, D.P.WADHWA
Sathyaprema Manjunatha Gowda – Appellant
Versus
Controller Of Estate Duty, Karnataka – Respondent


ORDER

This appeal is by certificate granted by the Division Bench of Karnataka High Court under Section 64(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953. The facts are very simple and lie in a narrow compass.

2. The appellant is the widow of Manjunatha Gowda. Manjunatha Gowda was a member of joint family consisting of Mallegowda, his father and other members of the Hindu Undivided Family. On May 4, 1965, on a partition amongst themselves, he got 4/5th share in the Hindu Undivided Family properties. On his demise, it is claimed that his unmarried daughter has 1/5th share in it and his widow, the appellant also has a share in that property.

3. He died on August 18, 1971 and when estate duty was sought to be imposed, the appellant claimed exclusion of her share and that of her daughter in the property under Section 8(1)(d) of the Hindu Law Women s Rights Act, 1933 (Mysore Act No. VIII of 1933), (for short, the Act ). The Estate Duty Officer excluded her share from taxable estate. But, on appeal, it was reversed, On a reference, the High Court held that the view taken by the Tribunal is correct. Thus this appeal.

4. The question on which reference was sought by the assessee is as under: "Whether in t
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top