SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 901

K.VENKATASWAMI, M.M.PUNCHHI
Kailash – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K. Venkataswami, J.-The appellants alongwith one Shiv Kumar and Guddan were tried by the Sessions Court, Aligarh for the offences under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC. The appellants and Guddan, in addition to the offences mentioned above, were tried for an offence under Section 394 IPC. One of the appellants Kailash son of Prem, (second appellant) and Guddan were further tried under Section 4/25 of the Arms Act also. The trial Court acquitted Shiv Kumar of the offences under Section 302 read with Section 34 but convicted him for an offence under Section 411 IPC. The appellants and Guddan were convicted for the offences charged against them. Additionally the second appellant was convicted under Section 4/25 Arms Act.

2. All the accused preferred appeals to the Allahabad High Court and the High Court while maintaining the conviction quashed the sentence imposed on Shiv Kumar and Guddan on the ground that they were minors when the offence was committed and by the time the judgment was rendered by the High Court they were majors (30 years ) and they could not be sent to approved school, purporting to follow the judgment of this court in Jayendra v. State of U.P.1. Accordi



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top