SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1055

J.JAGANNADHA RAO, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
State Of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Hitendra Kumar Bhatt – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

2. Heard both sides. In the Advertisement No. 1 of 1992 which was issued on 9.6.92 it was stated that the application form must reach the office of the Zila Parishad, Dungarpur latest by 5.00 p.m. on 29.6.92. The prescribed qualifications for the post required, inter alia practical/technical qualifications of B.S.T.C. or its equivalent, recognised by the State Government. The last paragraph of the advertisement stated that no certificates/marks-sheet will be accepted after the receipt of application forms in the office.

3. The respondent did not possess the requisite technical qualification on 29.6.92 which was the last date for submitting application. He had appeared for the B.Ed. Examination but the results were not declared on 29.6.92. The results were declared only on 6.8.92. The interviews for the advertised posts were held from 1st of September, 1992 onwards.

4. The respondent was not called for an interview since on the date of the receipt of his application, he did not possess any technical qualification. On 1.9.92 he filed a writ petition in the High Court of Rajasthan and obtained an interim order requiring the appellant to call him for an interview. Purs








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top