SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 965

S.B.MAJMUDAR, J.JAGANNADHA RAO
State Of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Hanuman Maljain – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Majmudar. J.- Leave granted in both these Special Leave Petitions.

2. By consent of learned advocates of parties the appeals were heard finally and are being disposed of by this common judgment. The appellants in both these appeals are State of Bihar and its officers in Rural Engineering Organisation. Respondent in both these appeals is also one and the same contractor. The appeals is also one and the same contractor. The grievance raised by the appellants centers round the orders passed by learned Subordinate Judge, Chaibasa, making awards rules of the Court in two Title Suits filed by the respondent against the appellants. These orders of the learned Subordinate Judge in turn were confirmed by the High Court of Patna in appeal moved by the appellants and that is how the appellants are before us in these proceedings. We shall refer to the respondent as plaintiff and the appellants as defendants in latter part of this judgment.

3. The plaintiff filed two Title Suits for recovering money dues from the defendants, in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Chaibasa. His contention was that while carrying out contract work entrusted to him by the defendants he had incurred expe






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top