SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1112

M.K.MUKHERJEE, S.SAGHIR AHMAD
Shabad Pulla Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M.K. Mukherjee, J.-Leave granted.

2. In Sessions Case No. 48 of 1983 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Warangal 26 persons were initially placed on trial to answer charges under Sections 120-B, 148, 449, 452, 460 and 302 I.P.C. An alternative charge under Section 396 I.P.C. was also framed against them. During pendency of the trial A-12 and A-14 died while A-13 and A-25 absconded. Hence, the trial continued against the other twenty two. On conclusion thereof the learned Judge acquitted A-1 of all the charges and convicted the others as under :

(i) A-2 to A-11, A-15, A-23, A-24 and A-26 under Section 120-B I.P.C;

(ii) A-8, A-15 to A-22, A-24 and A-26 under Section 148 I.P.C;

(iii) A-15 to A-22 under Section 449 I.P.C.;

(iv) A-22 under Section 302 I.P.C. (simpliciter);

(v) A-8, A-15 to A-21, A-24 and A-26 under Section 302/149 I.P.C. and

(vi) A-2 to A-7, A-9 to A-11 and A-23 under Section 302/109 I.P.C.

For the convictions so recorded that were sentenced to different terms of imprisonment with a direction that the sentences shall run concurrently.

3. Against their convictions and














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top