SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1108

G.B.PATTANAIK, V.N.KHARE, G.N.RAY, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Ratilal Laljibhai Tandol – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

Heard Mr. S.K. Dholakia, the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant-State of Gujarat and Mr. Sushil Kumar, the learned senior counsel appearing as amicus curiae to assist the Court in this matter. Certain observations made by the Gujarat High Court in disposing of Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 2941 of 95 in Criminal Appeal No. 375/95 (The State of Gujarat v. Ratilal Laljibhai Tandol and Anr.) are impugned in this appeal by the State of Gujarat.

2. It has been submitted by Mr. Dholakia that although on the proposal initiated by the Public Prosecutor for preferring appeal against order of acquittal the State Government takes the final decision, the State Government has felt that the opinion of the District Magistrate being in overall charge of the district is necessary for taking appropriate decision by State Government. Our attention has been drawn to the circular dated 23rd July, 1979 issued by the Legal Department of the Government of Gujarat being Circular No. Cri/Misc/5/78/24289/A2. It has been indicated in the said circular that the District Magistrate who is holding an important position in the District can reflect on several circumstanc








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top