SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1144

S.SAGHIR AHMAD, SUHAS C.SEN
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cntl) , Ludhiana – Appellant
Versus
Hero Cycles Private LTD. , Ludhiana – Respondent


ORDER

Civil Appeal No. 7665/96

The following question of law was referred by the Tribunal to the High Court:

"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case on a proper interpretation of Section 35-B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in allowing assessee s claim for weighted deduction in respect of "Export Sales Commission" "E.C.G.C. Charges" and "Foreign Dealers Visiting Expenses"?

2. The High Court declined to call for a reference under Section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It appears that the claim for deduction under Section 358 was not originally allowed at all. Thereafter, on an assessee s application an order was passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Jalandhar, in which he directed certain allowances to be given on proportionate basis after verification of the assessee s claim under Section 35B.

3. The Income Tax Officer thereafter entertained assessee s prayer for rectification of the order and allowed the assessee s claim in "respect of matters like Coloured Albums, Export staff travelling expenses, Export sales commission, E.C.G.C., foreign dealers visiting expenses. Rectification under Section 154 can only be m










































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top