SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1177

D.P.WADHWA, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Assam State Electricity Board – Appellant
Versus
Gajendra Nath Pathak – Respondent


JUDGMENT

D.P. Wadhwa, J.-Assam State Electricity Board (for short the Board ) is aggrieved by the judgment dated April 21, 1988 of the Division Bench of the Gauhati High Court giving directions to the Board to take necessary steps to consider the cases of the petitioners (now the respondents) for promotion to the higher post. This would be done within a period of two months of the receipt of this order by them. Subsequently also, the petitioners (now the respondents) would be treated alike the Junior Engineers for further promotion. There are four respondents who were petitioners in the writ petition before the Gauhati High Court in which the aforesaid direction was issued.

2. The Board is constituted under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 (for short the Act ). In the exercise of powers conferred upon it under Section 79(c) of the Act it has framed Regulation called "the Assam State Electricity Board Engineering Service Regulations, 1973 (for short the Regulation ).

3. The respondents are either matriculate or non-matriculate and are holding certificates and were appointed by the Board during the period from 1957 to 1963 to the Subordinate Engineer Grade-II. Prior












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top