SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1361

1997(9) Supreme 233
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Sujata V. Manohar & D.P. Wadhwa, JJ.
Ram Nath International Construction Pvt. Ltd. etc. -Appellants
versus
State of U.P. -Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 7374 of 1997
(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 4328 of 1997)
With
Civil Appeal No. 7375 of 1997 (arising out of SLP (C) No. 20055 of 1997
(CC 6248/97)
Decided on 21-10-1997
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appearing Parties : (Soli J. Sorabjee) A.B. Rohtagi, Sr. Advocates, (U.A. Rana, S. Tripathi), Advocates for M/s. Gagrat & Co. Advocates, K. Misra, R.B. Misra, Advocates.

IMPORTANT POINTS
1. Arbitrator has no jurisdiction to grant any interest for the pre-reference period.
2. When the terms of arbitration agreement did not exclude the jurisdiction of arbitrator to entertain a claim for interest the arbitrator is complaint to award interest pendente lite.

Headnote:(i) Arbitration Act, 1940-Section 30-Dispute in relation to payment for extra items of work-Arbitrator awarded claim in respect of extra item of earth work beyond lip cutting in the work of lining of Upper Ganga Canal-High Court disallowed claim on ground that arbitrator travelled beyond scope of reference-Rate for the work of excavation of Canal did no appear to be specified-Dispute was expressly referred to arbitrator-Arbitrator gave speaking award for work as extra work-It was a matter of interpretation of contract and was referred by parties to arbitration-High Court was not right that dispute was beyond scope of reference of arbitration. (Para 7)

       (ii) ARBITRATION-Arbitrator has no jurisdiction to grant any interest for pre-reference period-Arbitrator is competent to award interest pendente lite where terms of agreement did not exclude that jurisdiction of arbitrator. (Para 8)

       

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.-Delay in filing S.L.P. (C) No. 20055/97 (CC 6248/97) is condoned.

Leave in both the petitions is granted.

2. These cross appeals arise from a common judgment of the Allahabad High Court. For the sake of convenience, the appellant, M/s. Ram Nath International Construction Pvt. Ltd. in the appeal arising from S.L.P.(C) No. 4328 of 1997 is referred to as the appellant while the State of U.P. is referred to as the respondent.

3. The appellant entered into an agreement with the respondent dated 17.2.1989 for the work of lining of the Upper Ganga Canal from kilometres 189.50 to 197.00 at Gesupur in Bulandshahr. The total amount payable to the appellant under the agreement was Rs. 48,14,312. Clause 32 of the tender which related to "Extra Items" stated, "Extra items of work shall not vitiate the contract. The contractor shall be bound to execute extra items of work as directed by the Engineer Incharge. The rates of extra items are to be mutually agreed". Clause 51 which provides for arbitration is as follows:

ARBITRATION :

All the disputes in respect of which the decision has not been final and conclusive shall be referred for arbitration to a sole arbitrator appointed as follows.

.......................

........................

The arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 or any statutory modification thereof. The decision of the arbitrator shall be final and binding on the parties thereto. The arbitrator shall determine the amount of costs of arbitration to be awarded to either parties.

Performance under the contract shall continue during the arbitration proceedings and payments due to the contractor by the owner shall not be withheld unless they are the subject matter of the arbitration proceedings.

All award shall be in writing and in case of awards amounting to Rs. 100 lakhs above, such awards shall state reasons for the amounts awarded.

Neither party is entitled to bring a claim to arbitration if the arbitrator has not been appointed before the expiration of thirty days after defect liability period.

4. Disputes arose between the appellant and the respondent in connection with the execution of the work specified in the tender as also in relation to payment for extra items of work. Ultimately by an Office Memorandum dated October 4, 1992 disputes between the parties were referred to the sole arbitration of Shri Thakur Das, Chief Engineer, Design and Research, I.D.U.P., Lucknow. The terms of reference as recorded in the Office Memorandum are as follows :

"As such Shri Thakur Das, Chief Engineer, Design and Researh, I.D., U.P., Lucknow is hereby appointed as Arbitrator for the following claims as raised by the contractor vide his letter dated 13.12.1991 against the agreement No. B-2-02A-033 dated 17.2.1989 according to para 51 of the Agreement.

(i) Rate for extra item of earth work beyond lip cutting in reach km. 189.50 to km. 190.70.

(ii) Bailing out of standing water.

(iii) Earth work beyond lip cutting in reach km. 190.70 to km. 197.00.

(iv) Claims of idle labour due to non supply of cement."

5. The arbitrator has given a detailed speaking award dated 25.5.1994 under which, inter alia, in respect of the extra item of earth work beyond lip cutting in reach km. 189.50 to km. 190.70, the arbitrator has awarded a sum of Rs. 72,22,740/. The arbitrator has also awarded to the appellant interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the total amount of claim. (Rs. 1,71,11,208/-) with effect from 1.1.1991 to the date of the award and further interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the said amount from the date of the award till the date of the decree or payment whichever is earlier.

6. The appellant applied for a decree in terms of the award while the respondent filed objections. The District Judge granted decree in terms of the award. In the appeal which was filed before the High Court, t







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top