SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1361

SUJATA V.MANOHAR, D.P.WADHWA
Ram Nath International Construction Private LTD. – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.-Delay in filing S.L.P. (C) No. 20055/97 (CC 6248/97) is condoned.

Leave in both the petitions is granted.

2. These cross appeals arise from a common judgment of the Allahabad High Court. For the sake of convenience, the appellant, M/s. Ram Nath International Construction Pvt. Ltd. in the appeal arising from S.L.P.(C) No. 4328 of 1997 is referred to as the appellant while the State of U.P. is referred to as the respondent.

3. The appellant entered into an agreement with the respondent dated 17.2.1989 for the work of lining of the Upper Ganga Canal from kilometres 189.50 to 197.00 at Gesupur in Bulandshahr. The total amount payable to the appellant under the agreement was Rs. 48,14,312. Clause 32 of the tender which related to "Extra Items" stated, "Extra items of work shall not vitiate the contract. The contractor shall be bound to execute extra items of work as directed by the Engineer Incharge. The rates of extra items are to be mutually agreed". Clause 51 which provides for arbitration is as follows:

ARBITRATION :

All the disputes in respect of which the decision has not been final and conclusive shall be referred for arbitration to a sole arbitrat





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top