SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 33

B. N. KIRPAL, J. S. VERMA, V. N. KHARE
Collector Of Central Excise, Bombay – Appellant
Versus
K. W. H. Heliplastics LTD. – Respondent


Judgment

V.N. Khare, J.-These two appeals are directed against the order dated 12-8-92 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘tribunal’), whereby the tribunal allowed the respondent’s appeals holding that the tanks and vats manufactured by the assessee would be classified under sub-heading 3926.90 of the schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as “other articles of plastics” and not under heading 39.25 and sub-heading 3925.10 as “builders ware” of plastics.

2. The facts of the case, briefly stated, are these :

The respondent herein is engaged in business of manufacture of ves­sels, chemical tanks, reaction vessels, pipes and gobar gas plants. On a surprise inspection of the respondent’s factory by the Central Preventive Unit of the Central Excise Department it was found that the respondent’s unit was engaged in manufacture and sale of reservoir tanks etc. without payment of excise duty. Earlier, the respondent claimed exemption from licensing control by declaring the goods manu­factured by them being goods covered by sub-heading 3926.90 of the Central Excise Tariff Act. The Excise authorities being of th





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top