1998(1) Supreme 99
Supreme Court of India
(From Kerala High Court)
J.S. Verma, CJI., S.P. Bharucha, Suhas C. Sen, JJ.
Premier Breweries -Appellant
versus
State of Kerala -Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 4870 of 1991
(With C.A. Nos. 4871-74/91, 232/92, 6683-85/95, 6732-36/95, SLP (C) Nos. 6063-65/91)
Decided on 18-12-1997
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appearing Parties, A.S. Nambiar, Sr. Advocate, Sunil Gupta, Ms. A.K. Verma, C.N. Sreekumar, G. Prakash, Ms. Bina Gupta, P.P. Vineeth, K.M.K. Nair, Vipin Nair, Advocates.
Held that packed goods are to be taxed as composite units. In calculating the turnover of the goods, the turnover of the containers will have to be included. The appropriate rate of tax will be the rate payable on the goods. It will not make any difference, if the containers are shown to have been sold and charged separately. The logical corollary to this principle is that when the goods are exempted from tax, no tax is leviable on the containers. This will be the position even when the goods and the containers are sold and charged separately. (Para 6)
The law is quite clear that when the goods contained in containers or packed in packing materials are sold the containers and the packing materials will have to be taxed at the same rate at which the goods are liable to be taxed. It will not make any difference if the price payable for the containers or packing materials are shown separately in the bills raised by the seller. (Para 16)
Moreover, the packing materials as such are not being taxed under sub-section (5) of Section 5 of the Act. The subject-matter of tax are the goods packed in the containers. In calculating the turnover of the goods, packing materials will have to be taken into account. The packing materials will be taxed at the same rate and at the same point as the goods contained in the packing material. This is because the goods are sold packed in containers and are charged accordingly. This is a rule of computation of the turnover of the goods. If no tax is ultimately found leviable on the goods then no tax can be levied on the containers in which the goods are contained. (Para 19)
Judgment
Sen, J.- Premier Breweries Limited,
the appellant herein, is a dealer in Indian Made Foreign Liquor. The liquor is sold in bottles packed in cardboard cartons. The dispute in this case arose in course of sales tax assessment for the year 1982-83. Before the Assessing Officer the assessee’s case was that the cardboard cartons will have to be taxed at the rate of 8% under Entry 97 of the First Schedule of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 and not at the rate of 50% applicable to sale of liquor. The appellant’s case was that it had charged its customers separately for the liquor and the cartons. There was no reason to include the value of the cartons in the value of the liquor for the purpose of levy of tax. Initially, the assessee’s stand was accepted by the Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax and an assessment order was passed accordingly.
2. Later on the Deputy Commissioner, Palghat, thought that an error has been committed in the assessment order and in exercise of his revisional power under Section 35 of the Act he set aside the assessment order. The Deputy Commissioner was of the view that the Assessing Authority had erroneously levied tax at the rate of 8% on packing material viz. cardboard cartons. As per Section 5(5) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, where goods sold were contained in containers or were packed in any packing material, the rate of tax and the point of levy applicable to such containers or packing materials, as the case may be, should, whether the price of the containers or the packing materials was charged separately or not, be the same as that applicable to goods contained or packed. In determining turnover of the goods, the turnover in respect of the containers or packing materials will have to be included therein.
Thereafter, the assessment was revised in the manner indicated by the Deputy Commissioner. The view of the Deputy Commissioner was upheld by the Tribunal and also the High Court.
3. According to the appellant, the High Court has overlooked the fact that the containers were separately charged on the invoices raised by the appellant and the customers paid separately for the liquor and the containers. There is a specific Entry in the First Schedule under which tax has to be levied at the rate of 8% on the containers. It was not open to the Assessing Authority to include the value of the containers in the value of the liquor for the purpose of calculating the assessee’s turnover. Secondly, it has been contended that the cardboard cartons, in any event, are secondary containers provided for protection of the bottles in which the liquor was sold. The bottles were the primary containers of beer. The cartons were provided to ensure that the beer bottles were not broken in transit. Therefore, the turnover of the cartons could not in any way be included in the turnover of the beer sold by the appellant. Lastly, a point was taken that under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, a single point duty is leviable on the cardboard cartons. This duty has already been paid on these cartons by the manufacturers. Further levy on these cartons at the point of time when beer sold will be contrary to law. A large number of decisions were cited on behalf of the appellant as well as the respondents in support of their contentions.
4. Before examining the decisions, it will be useful to refer to the relevant provisions of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act. Tax on sale or purchase of goods has been imposed by Section 5 of the Act. Sub-sections (5) and (6) of Section 5 of the Act provide :
“5(5). Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) or sub-section (2), but subject to sub-section 6 where goods sold are contained in containers or are packed in any packing materials, the rate of tax and the point of levy applicable to the containers or packing materials, as the case may be, shall, whether the price of the containers or packing materials is charged separately or not, be the same as those appl
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.