SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 273

V.N.KHARE, S.B.MAJMUDAR
Rajasthan Public Service Commission – Appellant
Versus
Chanan Ram – Respondent


Judgment

S.B. Majumdar, J.-Leave granted in all these Special Leave Petitions.

2. By consent of learned advocates appearing for the contesting par­ties all these appeals were heard finally and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

3. The appellants in these appeals are aggrieved by the judgment and order rendered by the Division Bench of the High Court of Rajasthan in D.B. Civil Special Appeal No. 508 of 1996. By the impugned judgment the Division Bench of the High Court allowed the appeal of the origi­nal writ petitioner-common respondent No. 1 in these appeals whose writ petition was dismissed by the learned Single Judge at admittance stage. As a result of the decision of the Division Bench the Civil Special Appeal was allowed and the appellant-State of Rajasthan in Civil Appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 18511 of 1997 and the Rajasthan Public Service Commission Ajmer being appellant in Civil Appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 9698 of 1997, were directed to proceed with the recruitment process pursuant to the advertisement-Annexure P-1, for making appointments to the posts of Assistant Directors (Junior), redesignated as Market




































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top