SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 297

M.K.MUKHERJEE, K.T.THOMAS
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Dilipbhai Nathjibhai Patel – Respondent


Judgment

M.K. Mukherjee, J.-Leave granted.

2. The appellant No. 2, a District Co-operative Officer of Vadodara has lodged a prosecution against the two respondents under Section 147(1)(d) of the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act, 1961 (‘Act’ for short) for committing breach of Section 71 of the Act after obtaining sanction of the District Registrar as required under Section 149(3) thereof. The prosecution is also for certain offences under the Indian Penal Code. Aggrieved thereby the respondents moved the High Court by filing a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. In disposing of the peti­tion the High Court observed that a sanction under Section 149(3) for prosecution under Section 147(1)(d) cannot be given without giving the party concerned a prior hearing. Since, admittedly, the respondents were not given such hearing, the High Court directed that the com­plaint relating to the above offence shall not proceed till notice to the respondents were given and sanction was accorded after hearing them. However, it clarified, the complaint for the remaining offences shall, in no way be affected by its order and shall be proceeded with in accordance with law. The direction of the High Court













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top