K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY, V.RAMASWAMI, YOGESHWAR DAYAL
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Deoki Nandan Aggarwal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
V. RAMASWAMI, J.:- The respondent was elevated as Judge of the Allahabad High Court on November 17, 1977. He retired on October 3, 1983 on superannuation at the age of 62. He had elected to receive his pension under Part I of the First Schedule to the High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act, 1954. As he had put in only a period of five years 10 months and 17 days service as a Judge of the High Court, under Paragraph 9, Part I of the First Schedule pension payable was determined at the rate of Rs. 8,400/ - per annum and the family pension in the event of his death earlier than his wife at Rs. 250 per month in the letter of Accountant General, Allahabad dated December 2, 1983. The gratuity was worked out at Rs. 11,666.66 P in lump-sum under S. 17A(3) also on the ground that he had put in only five completed years of service. The pension was payable with effect from October 4, 198.3. The Act was amended by the Amending Act No. 38 of 1986 providing for an increased pension with effect from November 1, 1986. On December 10, 1986 the petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for an order or directions decl
N.L. Abhyankar v. Union of India
relied on : P.K. Unni v. Nirmala Industries
Sri Ram Ram Narain Medi v. State of Bombay
Hira Devi (Smt) v. District Board, Shahjahanpur
Nalinakhya by sack v. Shyam Sunder Haldar
Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. v. Gujarat Steel Tubes Mazdoor Sabha
S. Narayanaswami v. G. Pannerselvam
N.S. Vardachari v. G. Vasantha Pai
Union of India v. Sankal Chand Himatlal Sheth
CST v. Auriaya Chamber of Commerce, Allahabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.