SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 331

K.T.THOMAS, M.K.MUKHERJEE
State Of W. B. – Appellant
Versus
Pranab Ranjan Roy – Respondent


Judgment

Thomas, J.-Leave granted.

Respondent in this appeal was the Chief (Operation) of Central Inland Water Transport, Calcutta. Prosecution proceedings were launched against him under Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, on the allegation that he has acquired assets disproportionate to his known sources of income. But a Special Judge before whom the charge-sheet was laid, discharged him under Section 167(5) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (West Bengal Amendment). A revision petition was preferred by the State before the High Court of Calcutta assailing the said order of discharge, but in vain. Hence the State has filed this appeal by special leave.

2. Some relevant facts necessary for this appeal are the following:

The case against the respondent was registered on 27.8.1990. As the respondent desired to have some documents returned to him, he applied to the court of Special Judge on 29-2-1992 through an advocate praying for return of such documents. On the same day a vakalatnama was filed by his advocate in the Court. On 4.5.1994, the investigating agency submitted charge-sheet against the respondent for offence under Sec­tion 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(e)

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top