G.N.RAY, G.T.NANAVATI
Durgesh Chandra Saha – Appellant
Versus
Bimal Chandra Saha – Respondent
JUDGMENT :- This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 18th March, 1993, passed by a single Bench of Calcutta High Court in Criminal Revision No. 1238/92. By the impugned order, the learned Judge of Calcutta High Court inter alia came to the finding that in view of amendment of S. 167(5) of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the West Bengal Amendment Act 24 of 1988), the investigation of the entire case was required to be stopped by the trial Court after expiry of three years from the first date of appearance of the accused and the Court had also a duty to discharge all the accused after expiry of the said period of three years.
2. For the purpose of appreciating the rival contentions of the learned counsel appearing for the parties some of the events may be noted. On the 15th March, 1984, a complaint was lodged by the appellant in Gaighta police station, North 24 Paragans, West Bengal and on such complaint a police case No. 11 of 15th March, 1984 was initiated. On 8th February, 1988, the investigation was completed by the police and charge sheet was filed under Ss. 148/149/307/326/302 of IPC against the respondents Nos. 1-10 in the said case being numbered as G.R. Case No. 2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.