SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 155

J.JAGANNADHA RAO, S.B.MAJMUDAR
R. Rudraiah – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Judgment

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.-Leave granted in both SLPs.

2. In each of these appeals, the appellants are Sri B. Rudraiah and his son Sri B. Veeranna. The party respondents are Sri Lakshmi Nara­sappa (3rd respondent), Smt. Kittamma (wife of Late Narasimha Murthy) (4th respondent) and Sri S.N. Prahlada Rao, (son of Late Narasiah (Jr.) (5th respondent). These two appeals are directed against the orders in CRP No. 625 of 1988 and CRP No. 2898 of 1988 dated 18.7.1989 of the Karnataka High Court allowing the said revisions which were filed by Lakshmi Narasappa (3rd respondent) and S.N. Prah­lada Rao (5th respondent) respectively. In those revisions the appel­lants were respondents. The revisions filed in the High Court under Section 121-A of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 were allowed, setting aside the orders dated 7.11.1987 passed by the appellate authority and by the Land Tribunal on 27.4.1987 registering occupancy rights in favour of the first appellant i.e. B. Rudraiah in respect of 3 acres 34 guntas and 1 acre 24 guntas in Survey No. 55 and 62 respec­tively of Saneguruvanahalli village, Bangalore North Taluk. Aggrieved by the orders of the High Court dated 18.7.1989, these t





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top