SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 378

A.P.MISRA, K.VENKATASWAMI
Punjab Urban Planning And Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Saraswati Iron And Steel Re-rolling Mills – Respondent


Judgment

K. Venkataswami, J.-Special leave granted.

Heard counsel on both sides.

2. The appellant filed a suit for specific performance of the contract in question by returning (delivery) the goods weighing 124.255 Metric Tonnes rail/blooms or in the alternative to direct the defendant to pay a sum of Rs. 2 lacs against the non-delivery/supply of the said goods. Brief facts are the following:-

According to the appellant, it was agreed between the parties that the respondent herein accepted the offer for re-rolling of M.S. bars out of rails and blooms for all dias, i.e. 10 MM to 20 MM on certain conditions. The relevant conditions as given in the Plaint are the following:-

Condition No. 2 :

Steel will be supplied weight to weight.

Condition No. 3 :

The firm will be responsible for the quality of steel out of the material supplied by the Board.

Condition No. 4 :

The supplier shall be responsible for safe custody of the material supplied by the Board to them.

Condition No. 7 :

About 2000 Mts. of rail or bloom shall be got re-rolled from you during 1976-77.

3. The admitted facts are that the appellant supplied 1992.745 Metric Tonnes rail/ blooms in 1997 f













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top