SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 478

D.P.WADHWA, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
S. P. Shivprasad Pipal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.-This appeal arises from a judgment and order of the Central Administrative Tribunal at New Delhi dismissing the application filed by the appellant who was at the material time, Labour Commissioner working in the Ministry of Labour. The appellant has challenged the constitution of a Central Labour Service under the Central Labour Service Rules, 1987, issued by the President in the exercise of powers conferred on him under the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution. The Central Labour Service Rules, 1987 were brought into force by a notification dated 3.2.1987.

2. Under the notification of 3.2.1987 a Central Labour Service was created by merging the following three cadres :-

1. Central Industrial Relations Machinery consisting of Assist­ant Labour Commissioner (Central), Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), Joint Chief Labour Commissioner (Central) and Chief Labour Commissioner (Central).

2. Labour Officers (Central pool) consisting of Labour Officers and senior Labour Officers.

3. Labour Welfare Commissioners’ Cadre consisting of Assistant Welfare Commissioner and Welfare Commissioner.

3. Accordin


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top