SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 541

G.N.RAY, G.B.PATTANAIK
Mohd. Hadi Raja – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

G.N. Ray, J.-The common question of law that arises in all these matters is whether the provisions of sanction under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 are applicable for prosecuting officers of the public sector undertakings or the Government Companies when on account of deep and pervasive control of fin­ance and adminis­tration of such undertakings and government companies, they are held as State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India?

2. It will be appropriate at this stage to refer to the provisions of Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure:-

Section 197: Prosecution of Judges and Public Servants-(1) When any person who is or was a Judge or Magistrate or a public servant not removable from his office save by or with the sanction of the Govern­ment is accused of any offence alleged to have been committed by him while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty, no Court shall take cognizance of such offence except with the previous sanction-

(a) in the case of a person who is employed or as the case may be, was at the time of commission of the alleged offence employed, in connection with






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top