G.N.RAY, G.B.PATTANAIK
Mohd. Hadi Raja – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
Judgment
G.N. Ray, J.-The common question of law that arises in all these matters is whether the provisions of sanction under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 are applicable for prosecuting officers of the public sector undertakings or the Government Companies when on account of deep and pervasive control of finance and administration of such undertakings and government companies, they are held as State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India?
2. It will be appropriate at this stage to refer to the provisions of Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure:-
Section 197: Prosecution of Judges and Public Servants-(1) When any person who is or was a Judge or Magistrate or a public servant not removable from his office save by or with the sanction of the Government is accused of any offence alleged to have been committed by him while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty, no Court shall take cognizance of such offence except with the previous sanction-
(a) in the case of a person who is employed or as the case may be, was at the time of commission of the alleged offence employed, in connection with
Director of Inspection & Audit & Ors. v. C.L. Subramaniam
Shambhoo Nath Misra v. State of U.P. & Ors.
C.V. Raman v. Management of Bank of India & Anr.
Dr. S.L. Agarwal v. The General Manager, Hindustan Steel Ltd.
Praga Tools Corporation v. C.V. Imanaul & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.