SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 590

J.JAGANNADHA RAO, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Hindustan Times LTD. , New Delhi – Respondent


Order

These appeals pertain to one of the questions considered by the High Court under Section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 at the instance of the Revenue. The appeals pertain to assessment years 1973-74, 1974-75 and 1977-78 to 1980-81. The question as framed for the assessment years 1973-74, 1974-75 and 1977-78 was as follows :-

“Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was justified in law in upholding the order of the CIT(A) on the group that no injustice was caused to the revenue by the order passed by the CIT(A) in directing that the assessee was entitled to add a sum of Rs. 36,96,516/- to the cost of building and claim depreciation thereon?”

2. The question is not very happily worded. A similar question was also raised in respect of the other assessment years. The question basically is : Whether the assessee is entitled to depreciation in respect of a sum of Rs. 36,96,516/- which it claimed as part of the actual cost of construction of a building constructed by it for busi­ness purposes.

3. The assessee had purchased an existing residential building bearing Nos. 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi, in the year 1961. The assessee wanted to us












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top