SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 963

K.RAMASWAMY, G.B.PATTANAIK
P. Ratnakar Rao – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of A. P. – Respondent


Order

Delay condoned.

2. This special leave petition arises from the judgment and order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dated December 29, 1995 made in Writ Petition No. 23323 of 1995. The petitioners are the owners of the goods motor vehicles and were plying the same on the basis of pucca national/State permits issued by the appropriate transport authori­ties. When they challenged the validity of GOMS No. 54 dated March 31, 1995 issued by the Department of Transport (Roads and Buildings) en­hancing the compounding fee from Rs. 10 per k.g. to Rs. 100/- per k.g. as being violative of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, the “Act”) and arbitrary being violative Article 14 of the Constitution, the Division Bench in the impugned judgment upheld the said GOMS.

3. Section 194 of the Act enacts penal sanctions for driving a vehicle in violation of Sections 113 to 115 of the Act with a minimum fine of Rs. 2,000/- and additional amount of Rs. 1,000/- per tonne of excess load together with liability to pay charges for off-loading of the excess load. Sub-section (2) thereof imposes penalty on the driver who refuses to stop and submit the vehicle to weighing after being direct­ed to do so by








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top