1998(5) Supreme 226
Supreme Court of India
B.P. Jeevan Reddy & B.N. Kirpal, JJ.
Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action etc. -Petitioners
versus
Union of India & Ors. etc. -Respondents
Writ Petition (C) No. 967 of 1989
With
W.P. (C) Nos. 94/90, 824/93 and 76/94
Decided on 13-2-1996
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Respondents : K.N. Bhat, Advocate.
For the Petitioner : M.C. Mehta, Advocate.
For the State of Rajasthan : Aruneshwar Gupta, Advocate.
For the RPCB : K.B. Rohatgi, Advocates.
Held : We are convinced that the law stated by this Court in Oleum Gas Leak Case is by far the more appropriate one-apart from the fact that it is binding upon us. (We have disagreed with the view that the law stated in the said decision is obiter.) According to this rule, once the activity carried on is hazardous or inherently dangerous, the person carrying on such activity is liable to make good the loss caused to any other person by his activity irrespective of the fact whether he took reasonable care while carrying on his activity. (Para 64)
Held then : Once the law in Oleum Gas Leak Case is held to be the law applicable, it follows, in the light of our findings recorded hereinbefore, that Respondents Nos. 4 to 8 are absolutely liable to compensate for the harm caused by them to villagers in the affected area, to the soil and to the underground water and hence, they are bound to take all necessary measures to remove the sludge and other pollutants lying in the affected area (by affected area, we mean the area of about 350 ha. indicated in the sketch at Page 178 of NEERI Report) and also to defray the cost of the remedial measures required to restore the soil and the underground water sources. Sections 3 and 4 of Environment (Protection) Act confers upon the Central Government the power to give directions of the above nature and to the above effect. Levy of costs required for carrying out remedial measures is implicit in Sections 3 and 4 which are couched in very wide and expansive language. Appropriate directions can be given by this Court to the Central Government to invoke and exercise those powers with such modulations as are called for in the facts and circumstances of this case. (Para 65)
(ii) Constitution of India-Art. 21-Right to life-Writ petitions on behalf of villagers of Bichhri village (Udaipur)-Conclusions and directions issued to Union of India, State of Rajasthan and R.P.C.B. accordingly-Writ allowed with costs. (Paras 69, 71 & 73)
Judgment
B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.-Writ Petition (C) No. 967 of 1989:
This writ petition filed by an environmentalist organisation brings to light the woes of people living in the vicinity of chemical industrial plants in India. It highlights the disregard, nay, contempt for law and lawful authorities on the part of some among the emerging breed of entrepreneurs, taking advantage, as they do, of the country’s need for industrialisation and export earnings. Pursuit of profit has absolutely drained them of any feeling for fellow human beings-for that matter, for anything else. And the law seems to have been helpless. Systemic defects? It is such instances which have led many people in this country to believe that disregard of law pays and that the consequences of such disregard will never be visited upon them-particularly, if they are men with means. Strong words indeed-but nothing less would reflect the deep sense of hurt, the hearing of this case has instilled in us. The facts of the case will bear out these opening remarks.
2. Bichhri is a small village in Udaipur district of Rajasthan. To its north is a major industrial establishment, Hindustan Zinc Limited, a public sector concern. That did not affect Bichhri. Its woes began somewhere in 1987 when the fourth respondent herein, Hindustan Agro Chemicals Limited started producing certain chemicals like Oleum (said to be the concentrated form of Sulphuric acid) and Single Super Phosphate. The real calamity occurred when a sister concern, Silver Chemicals (Respondent No. 5), commenced production of ‘H’ acid in a plant located within the same complex. ‘H’ acid was meant for export exclusively. Its manufacture gives rise to enormous quantities of highly toxic effluents-in particular, iron-based and gypsum-based sludge-which if not properly treated, pose grave threat to mother Earth. It poisons the earth, the water and everything that comes in contact with it. Jyoti Chemicals (Respondent No. 8) is another unit established to produce ‘H’ acid, besides some other chemicals. Respondents Nos. 6 and 7 were established to produce fertilizers and a few other products.
3. All the units/factories of Respondents Nos. 4 to 8 are situated in the same complex and are controlled by the same group of individuals. All the units are what may be called “chemical industries”. The complex is located within the limits of Bichhri village.
4. Because of the pernicious wastes emerging from the production of ‘H’ acid, its manufacture is stated to have been banned in the western countries. But the need of ‘H’ acid continues in the West. That need is catered to by the industries like the Silver Chemicals and Jyoti Chemicals in this part of the world. (A few other units producing ‘H’ acid have been established in Gujarat, as would be evident from the decision of the Gujarat High Court in Pravinbhai Jashbhai & Ors. v. State of Gujarat & Anr.1, a decision rendered by one of us, B.N. Kirpal, J. as the Chief Justice of that Court). Silver Chemicals is stated to have produced 375 MT of ‘H’ acid. The quantity of ‘H’ acid produced by Jyoti Chemicals is not known. It says that it produced only 20 mt., as trial production, and no more. Whatever quantity these two units may have produced, it has given birth to about 2400-2500 MT of highly toxic sludge (iron-based sludge and gypsum-based sludge) besides other pollutants. Since the toxic untreated waste waters were allowed to flow out freely and because the untreated toxic sludge was thrown in the open in and around the complex, the toxic substances have percolated deep into the bowels of the earth polluting the acquifers and the sub-terranean supply of water. The water in the wells and the streams has turned dark and dirty rendering it unfit for human consumption. It has become unfit for cattle to drink and for irrigating the land. The soil has become polluted rendering it unfit for cultivation, the main stay of the villagers. The resulting misery to the villagers ne
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.