SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1363

D.P.WADHWA, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Banarasi Das – Appellant
Versus
Maharaja Sukhjit Singh – Respondent


Judgment

D.P. Wadhwa, J.-Plaintiff is in appeal. He is aggrieved by the judg­ment dated May 20, 1992 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court passed in regular second appeal whereby his suit for injunction both perpetual and mandatory was dismissed. The trial Court had also dismissed the suit though he succeeded in the first appeal.

2. Plaintiff instituted his suit on May 3, 1986. The sole defendant was Brig. Maharaja Sukhjit Singh. The plaintiff sought a decree for permanent injunction restraining him from interfering in the land measuring 32 Kls 12 mls situated in the revenue estate of Jalandhar of which the plaintiff claimed to be in culivating possession. During the pendency of the suit the plaintiff impleaded Balbir Singh Chandi as defendant No. 2 and amended plaint was filed on June 14, 1986. Now, the plaintiff said that the first defendant through his attorney Pritpal Singh allowed the second defendant to take forcible and ille­gal possession of land measuring 1 kanal 12 mls out of the suit land and that the second defendant started raising construction thereon. The plaintiff, therefore, also sought a relief for mandatory injunc­tion directing the defendants (now respondents) to d












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top