G. T. NANAVATI, S. C. AGRAWAL
Union Of India: P. N. Kohli – Appellant
Versus
R. Iyyaswamy – Respondent
Judgment
Nanavati, J.-Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for both the sides.
2. Only question that arises for consideration in these appeals is whether Rule 2(1)(a) of the Assistant Engineers (Akashwani and Doordarshan Group ‘B’ Posts) Recruitment (Amendment) Rules, 1985 is discriminatory and, therefore, violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. The Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal has held that it is. Challenging the decision of the Tribunal, the Union of India and also P.N. Kohli and Malchar Malviya who were respondent Nos. 2 and 3 before the Tribunal, have filed these appeals.
3. The All India Radio and Doordarshan have a common technical cadre. The channel of promotion in the Engineering Section is from the post of Engineering Assistant to the post of Senior Engineering Assistant and then to the post of Assistant Engineer (Gazetted). Earlier, recruitment to the post of Assistant Engineer was made in accordance with the Recruitment Rules of 1972. Under those Rules, 60 per cent posts of Engineering Assistants were reserved for departmental Engineering Assistants who were degree-holders and 40 per cent posts were filled up by direct recruitment
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.