SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 668

K.VENKATASWAMI, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
O. R. G. Systems, Baroda – Appellant
Versus
Collector Of Central Excise, Vadodara – Respondent


Judgment

K. Venkataswami, J.-These two appeals arise out of a common order dated 5.7.94 of the Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribu­nal, New Delhi (hereinafter called “the Tribunal”). The issues that arise out of the order of the Tribunal under appeal are no longer res integra. The decision of this Court in PSI Data Systems Ltd. v. Col­lector of Central Excise1 settles the controversial issues raised in these appeals.

2. Briefly stated the facts are the following :-

The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of Computers falling under Tariff Item 33-DD from May, 1982 when they got the necessary licence. Prior to May, 1982, the appellant got the Computers manufactured by (a) M/s. Digital Systems International (for short ‘DSI’) and (b) M/s. Orbit Electronics (for short ‘Orbit’) by supplying raw materials and also by supplying specifications and designs. The Computers so manu­factured by the appellant, as stated above, as well as those manufac­tured by the appellant after May, 1982 were marketed by M/s. Adprint Services Limited, Baroda (for short ‘Adprint’). At this stage, it is necessary to make it clear that the Revenue seriously claimed all through that DSI and Orbit wer






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top