SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 683

1998(6) Supreme 161
Supreme Court of India
(From Patna High Court)
G.T. Nanavati & S.P. Kurdukar, JJ.
Md. Mahiruddin & Ors. -Appellants
versus
State of Bihar -Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 223 of 1997
Decided on 23-7-1998
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants : B.B. Sinha, Advocate (A.C.)
For the Respondent : A.K. Jha, Advocate.

Headnote:Indian Penal Code, 1860-Section 302/34 - Murder-Appeal against con­viction-Conviction rendered by trial Court on basis of proved circum­stances-Confirmed by High Court on reappreciation of evidence - False explanation of appellant supplied missing link in chain of circum­stances which was otherwise complete - Conviction rightly upheld.

       

Judgment

Nanavati, J.-The appellants are challenging the judgment of the Patna High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 10/88, whereby the conviction of the appellants was upheld.

The three appellants were convicted under Section 302 read with Sec­tion 34 IPC for the murder of Bibi Matluwa by the trial Court after considering the circumstances which were proved against them. The High Court on reappreciation of the evidence has also come to the conclu­sion that the prosecution had satisfactorily proved the incriminating circumstances which establish the guilt of the appellants. The trial Court and also the High Court took into consideration the false expla­nation given by the appellants soon after the incident as regards the cause of death of Bibi Matluwa.

In our opinion, the courts below were right in relying upon these circumstances and the false explanation given by the appellants which supplied the missing link in the chain of circumstances which was otherwise complete.

Having gone through the evidence and the judgments of both the courts below, we are satisfied that they were rightly convicted by the trial Court and their conviction has been rightly upheld by the High Court.

This appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

(C.R.) Appeal dismissed.

**********

Parallel Citations of other Journals :

Md. Mahiruddin & Ors. v. State of Bihar, 1998(6) Supreme 161

00024

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top