SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 756

K.VENKATASWAMI, S.P.BHARUCHA
Bhadrachalam Paperboards LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of A. P. – Respondent


Judgment

K. Venkataswami, J.-The appellants moved the High Court of Andhra Pradesh under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issu­ance of a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in demanding and collecting sales tax from them on the royalty and ex­traction charges paid for the supply of bamboo and hardwood to them from the forest for the period 1978-79 onwards as illegal, null and void and for a consequential relief of refund of the taxes so collect­ed from them.

2. The admitted facts are that the appellants entered into an agree­ment on 27.3.1978 with the State Government for supply of bamboo and hardwood from the Government forest on certain terms and conditions. The Sales Tax Department demanded and collected sales tax upon the value of the bamboo and hardwood removed by the appellants from the forest. Under the State Sales Tax Act, during the relevant period the commodity (bamboo and hardwood) was exigible to tax at the first sale and as such the Forest Department, who was a dealer, was liable to pay the sales tax. However, under the agreement mentioned above, the appellants undertook to reimburse the Forest Department the amount of sales tax paya















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top