S.RAJENDRA BABU, A.S.ANAND, M.SRINIVASAN
Canara Bank – Appellant
Versus
P. R. N. Upadhyaya – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. Anand, J.-Leave granted.
This appeal is directed against an award made by the Banking Ombudsman, Hyderabad, (appointed under the Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 1995) dated 26.2.1997, in a complaint filed by the respondents against the appellant bank. The appeal arises in the following circumstances :
2. On 12.1.1980, the appellant bank sanctioned a loan of Rs. 80000/- in favour of respondent No. 3 for construction of a strong room. A further loan of Rs. 25000/- was granted to respondent No. 3 on 21.2.1986 to meet part of the construction cost of the premises which were to be taken on lease by the appellant. On 22.2.1991, an additional loan of Rs. 200000/- was granted by the appellant bank to respondent No. 3 to construct a bigger strong room. The entire premises, after the construction/renovation, were taken on lease by the appellant bank. In respect of the loan granted on 12.1.1980, respondent No. 3 executed a Demand Promissory Note undertaking to pay interest at the rate of 5% above the Reserve Bank of India rate of interest with minimum rate of interest @ 14% per annum compounded quarterly. So far as the loan granted on 21.2.1986 is concerned, respondent No. 3 executed a De
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.