SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 886

1998(7) Supreme 146
Supreme Court of India
(From Calcutta High Court)
G.T. Nanavati & S. Rajendra Babu, JJ.
State of West Bengal & Ors. -Appellants
versus
Ajoy Kumar Banerjee -Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 12796 of 1996
Decided on 27-8-1998
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants : Tapas Ray, Sr. Advocate, Rajesh Srivastava & H.K. Puri, Advocates.
For the Respondent : A.K. Ganguli, Sr. Advocate and Ranjan Mukherjee, Advocate.

Important Point
In view of special fact, contentions raised not decided and appeal was dismissed.

Headnote:Only one post of Protocol ­Officer in Calcutta High Court-Additional Financial burden likely to fall upon the State Govt. found to be insignificant-So questions raised not proper to decide-Appeal dis­missed.

       

Judgment

The learned counsel for the State of West Bengal wanted to raise some important questions of law in this appeal: but, in view of the fact that there is only one post of Protocol Officer in the High Court and the additional financial burden likely to fall upon the State Government will be insignificant, we do not think it proper to decide those questions in this appeal. We, therefore, dismiss this appeal.

(N.K.R.) Appeal dismissed.

**********

Parallel Citations of other Journals :

State of West Bengal v. Ajay Kumar Banerjee, 1998(7) Supreme 146 : JT 1998(6) SC 195

00022

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top