SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 877

G.T.NANAVATI, S.RAJENDRA BABU
State Of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Vasantrao Deshpande – Respondent


Judgment

Nanavati, J.-The State of Maharashtra is challenging in this appeal the order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 125/93.

2. The respondent was appointed as a Lecturer in Statistics and Demog­raphy in SRTC Medical College, Ambejogai on 14.11.79. He was appointed initially for a period of four months purely on adhoc basis and till a regularly selected candidate was available. However, the appointment continued from year to year without any break for eight years. Mean­while, he also obtained Ph.D. in Statistics. On completion of eight years of service, the respondent made representations to the concerned authorities for regularising his service and to grant him the benefit of higher pay-scale under University Grants Commission Scheme for merit promotion of Teachers working under post partum programme. As his representations were not accepted, he approached the Tribunal and sought the following two reliefs :

“(A) By issue of an appropriate order or direction Respondents No. 1 & 2 be directed regularise the services of applicant with award­ing permanancy benefits.

(B) By issue of an appropriate order or directed the respondents No. 1 & 2 be directed to a











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top