SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 581

V.N.KHARE, A.S.ANAND, B.N.KIRPAL
Environment Awareness Forum – Appellant
Versus
State Of J & K – Respondent


Order

I.A. No. 16 :

We have heard Mr. Dipankar Gupta, learned Senior counsel appearing for the officials of the State Government who have filed their coun­ters in response to the notice issued by this Court. We have also heard Mr. T.R. Andhyarujina, learned Senior counsel representing Mr. B.A. Karimi, the Managing Director of M/s. Bekay Katha Pvt. Ltd., who has filed an affidavit in this Court on March 1998.

2. Mr. Dipankar Gupta, in response to the directions issued to him by us on 4th of May, has brought to our notice various steps which are taken by the Administrative Department and the Forest Department of the State of Jammu & Kashmir after the orders of this Court dated 10th May, 1996, 12th December 1996 and 4th March 1997.

3. From a perusal of the office notings, it appears that M/s. Bekay Kattha Pvt. Ltd. represented to the State Government vide letter dated 18th of March 1997 that this Court had exempted “minor forest produce from the ban on fellings “vide order dated 4th March 1997. On the basis of that representation, an office note was prepared in which para 65 reads thus:

“ Katha’ is a Minor Forest Produce. The Katha is manufactured from the Khair wood. In pursuance of the


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top