SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 194

K.VENKATASWAMI, S.P.KURDUKAR
Supreme Court Legal Services Committee – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Order

In our order dated 25.11.97 we were constrained to point out that in spite of lapse of two years nothing has been done and therefore we were required to direct all the States to comply with the directions in all States to comply with the directions in all respects by Febru­ary 3, 1998. Except the State of Orissa, none of the States have complied with the directions given in full. In fact this Court in the said order observed as follows:

“It is made clear that in the event of failure to comply with these directions, contempt proceedings will have to be initiated against the Chief Secretary of the State Government/Union Territory Administration concerned. An affidavit about compliance of these directions shall be filed on behalf of the State Governments/Union Territories by Febru­ary 3, 1998.”

2. As pointed out, except State of Orissa, no other State/Union Terri­tory has complied with our directions in full. Some excuses are sought to be given before us but we do not find any justification for accept­ing such lame excuses.

3. Therefore, we direct the Registry to issue notices for contempt, except to State of Orissa, as directed in the order dated 25.11.97 returnable by 5.5.1998.

4.








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top