SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 1238

J.JAGANNADHA RAO, S.SAGHIR AHMAD
Dwijen Chandra Sarkar – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.-Two appellants who are working in the Posts and Telegraph Department filed this appeal against the judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Calcutta Bench in O.A. No. 355 of 1987 dated 16.02.1988. By that Judgment the Tribunal dismissed the application filed by the appellants. The point in issue is whether for the purpose of computing 16 years service for getting a “time-bound promotion”, as per the relevant circular of the Government dated 17.12.1983, the appellants are entitled to count the service rendered by them in the Rehabilitation Department of the Government of India prior to their transfer to the Department of Posts and Telegraph. The Tribunal has held that the said service with former department cannot be counted and, therefore, the appellants are not entitled to the time bound promotion unless they complete 16 years in the transferee de­partment, namely P & T Department.

2. The following are the facts:

The appellants 1 and 2 were appointed as Lower Division Clerks in the Department of Rehabilitation, Government of India on 18.11.1970 and 5.2.1965 respectively. Subsequently, on 7.12.76 the first appellant was transferred to the P & T D
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top