SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
KULDIP SINGH AND B. P. JEEVAN REDDY, JJ.
Smt. Renu Mullick, Appellant
Versus
Union of India and another, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 7143 of 1993 (arising out of S. L. P. (c) No. 8586 of 1992), D/- 19-11-1993.
Central Excise and Land Customs Department Group C Posts Recruitment Rules, 1979 - Rule 4 - Post of tipper Division Clerk – Cadre – Seniority - According to executive instructions dated issued by Central Board of Excise and Customs, a Group C Officer, when transferred on his own request, from one Central Excise Collectorate to another is not entitled to count service rendered by him in former Collectorate for purpose of seniority in new charge - Question for Court consideration is whether said officer is further deprived of said service even for determining his eligibility for promotion to higher cadre - Central Administrative Tribunal Bench, has answered question in affirmative - Appellant, joined service in Directorate of Statistics and Intelligence, Central Excise and Customs - New Delhi on as Lower Division Clerk (LDC) - She was promoted to post of tipper Division Clerk (UDC) - She was transferred on her own request, by Order dated and she joined as UDC on in Central Excise Collectorate – Appellant along with several other UDCs was considered for promotion to post of Inspector by Departmental Promotion Committee in accordance with Central Excise and Land Customs Department Group C Posts Recruitment Rules, 1979 (the rules) - Held, rule no where lays down that 5 years or 13 years have to be spent in one Collectorate - There is no indication, whatsoever in rule that service period of 5 years and 13 years is not applicable to an officer who has been transferred from one Collectorate to another on his own request - Appellant has stated in para II of the petition that 8 persons junior to appellant were promoted as Inspectors - According to her, even if it is assumed that she was ineligible, she was entitled to be promoted in terms of Note 3 to Schedule to rules (reproduced above) read with Office Memorandum dated (quoted above) - This argument has not been dealt with by Tribunal - Prima facie there is force in the argument but it is not necessary for Court to go into the same - Court allow appeal, set aside judgment of Central Administrative Tribunal, dated and allow application of appellant before said Tribunal – Court quash order dated reverting appellant from post of Inspector to post of Tax Assistant – Court direct that appellant shall be deemed to be continuing to hold post of Inspector from date when she originally joined as Inspector as a result of promotion order dated - She will be entitled to all consequential benefits including full back wages - Appeal allowed.
Judgment
KULDIP SINGH, J.:- Special leave granted.
2. According to the executive instructions dated May 20, 1980, issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs, a Group C Officer, when transferred on his own request, from one Central Excise Collectorate to another, is not entitled to count the service rendered by him in the former Collectorate for the purpose of seniority in the new charge. The question for our consideration is whether the said officer is further deprived of the said service even for determining his eligibility for promotion to the higher cadre. The Central Administrative Tribunal Allahabad Bench, has answered the question in the affirmative. This appeal by way of special leave is against the judgment of the Tribunal.
3. Renu Mullick, the appellant, joined service in the Directorate of Statistics and Intelligence, Central Excise and Customs. New Delhi on December 17, 1974 as Lower Division Clerk (LDC). She was promoted to the post of tipper Division Clerk (UDC) on May 10, 1981. She was transferred, on her own request, to Allahabad by the Order dated July 30, 1987, and she joined as UDC on August 4, 1987 in the Central Excise Collectorate at Allahabad.
4. Executive instructions dated May 20, 1980, issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs provide for inter collectorate transfers on the conditions specified therein. The relevant conditions in para 2 (ii) and para 3 are as under:---
"2(ii). The transferee will not be entitled to count the service rendered by him in the former Collectorate for the purpose of seniority in the new charge. In other words, lie will be treated as a new entrant in the Collectorate to which he is transferred and will be placed at the bottom of the list of the temporary employees of the concerned cadre in the new charge,
3. A written undertaking to abide by the requisite terms and conditions may be obtained from the employees seeking transfers before the transfers are actually effected."
5. The appellant gave the necessary undertaking in the following words:
"I hereby agree to and undertake to comply with the conditions detailed below:
1. My seniority will be fixed below the last temporary U.D.C. in the Allahabad Collectorate, i.e. I will be treated as a fresh entrant in the cadre of U.D.C. in the new charge.
2. No transfer, travelling allowance and joining time etc., will be admissible to me as a result of this transfer.
3. I will not be considered for further confirmation and promotion in the Directorate of S & I. Central Excise and Customs, New Delhi.
I will be adjusted against a direct recruit and unreserved vacancy in the grade of U.D.C."
6. It is not disputed that on joining Central Excise Collectorate, Allahabad, the appellant was placed at the bottom of the seniority list in accordance with the Government instructions quoted above. The appellant does not make any grievance about the fixation of her seniority in the new charge at Allahabad.
7. In the year 1991, the appellant along with several other UDCs was considered for promotion to the post of Inspector by the Departmental Promotion Committee in accordance with the Central Excise and Land Customs Department Group C Posts Recruitment Rules, 1979 (the rules). Rule 4 read with the Schedule to the rules lays down the eligibility qualifications for promotion to the post of Inspector. The relevant extract is reproduced hereunder:-
"Inspector: Promotion by selection from U.D.C. with 5 years service or U.D.C. with 13 years of total service as U.D.C. and L.D.C. taken together subject to the condition that they should have put In a minimum of two years of service in the grade of U.D.C. ............"
Note 3: If a junior person is considered for promotion on the basis of his completing the prescribed qualifying period of service in that grade, all persons senior to him in the grade shall also be considered for promotion, notwithstanding that they may not have rendered the prescribed qualifying period of service in that grade but have complete
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.