UMESH C.BANERJEE, S.B.MAJMUDAR
Management Of Mcd – Appellant
Versus
Prem Chand Gupta – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. Majmudar, J.-This appeal on grant of special leave to appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution of India by the Management of Municipal Corporation of Delhi against Respondent No. 1, who is the only contesting party, has brought in challenge the judgment and order of the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi in Letters Patent Appeal No. 93 of 1982 by which the High Court directed reinstatement of Respondent No. 1 in service with continuity entitling him to receive all salaries and allowances from the appellant-Corporation. In order to appreciate the grievance of the appellant-Corporation against the said order, a few relevant introductory facts need to be noticed at the outset.
Background Facts :
2. Respondent No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the respondent-workman ) was appointed by the appellant-Corporation on the temporary post of Section Officer (Civil) on 5.5.1964 with the condition that he would be considered for confirmation after one year of satisfactory service. It is the case of the appellant-Corporation that the respondent-workman was never considered for confirmation. On 1.8.1964 he was informed that his services were not required by the Corporation
Superintendent R.M.S. Cochin & Anr. v. K.V. Gopinath, Sorter
Union of India & Ors. v. Arun Kumar Roy
Raj Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The State Bank of India v. Shri N. Sundara Money
Birla VXL Ltd. v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Rajasthan Adult Education Association & Anr. v. Ashoka Bhatacharya (Km) & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.