SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 337

K.S.HEGDE, S.SAGHIR AHMAD
Baburam – Appellant
Versus
C. C. Jacob – Respondent


Judgment

Santosh Hegde, J.-C.A. Nos. 10658-59/96 :

These appeals arise out of the order dated 22.9.1995 made by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench (for short ‘the tribunal’) in O.A. Nos. 186/94, 961/95 and 1192/94. The applicants therein questioned the selection made by the Departmental Promotion Committee and consequential promotion of the appellant to the post of Superintendent of Customs in a vacancy reserved for Scheduled Castes. The contention before the tribunal was that the percentage of reserva­tion has always to be worked out in relation to the number of posts which formed the cadre strength and the said reservation is not to be made with reference to a vacancy.

2. Since the law in regard to the above stated position was nebulous, a Constitution Bench of this Court in the case of R.K. Sabharwal & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors.1 settled the said issue holding that such reservation is in relation to the number of posts comprising in the cadre and not in relation to vacancies. The judgment of the Con­stitution Bench was delivered on 10.2.1995. This Court in the said judgment after taking into consideration the fact that the law was not clear till that date, obs











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top