SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 364

R.C.LAHOTI, S.P.BHARUCHA
Premier Cable Company LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin – Respondent


Judgment

Bharucha, J.-The basic questions with which we are concerned in these appeals, relating to the Assessment Year 1976-77, read thus :

“(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, was the Tribunal right in holding that the Commissioner of Income Tax had jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act to revise the order of the Income Tax Officer passed after obtaining directions from the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner under Section 144B of the Act?

(ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, was the Appellate Tribunal right in law in holding that assessment year 1975-76 is the 8th assessment year immediately succeeding the assessment year 1967-68 for the purpose of carry forward and set off of unabsorbed development rebate under Section 33(2)(ii) of the Act and not the assessment year 1976-77?

(iii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Appellate Tribunal right in holding that for the purpose of carry forward of 80J relief the assessment year 1975-76 is the 4th assessment year immediately succeeding the assessment year 1971-72 and not the assessment year 1976-77?





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top